February 9, 2012

The Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown

You know how, when you love a book (or a person or a restaurant or an item of clothing), you can overlook flaws? You think, "Oh, I didn't even notice that the writing was terrible/she bites her nails/the restaurant never has cold water because everything else is so great!" 

And in the opposite way, when something irritates you, you are very quick to notice even more flaws. "I knew I didn't like this restaurant. Not only is the food terrible, but the parking stinks and the waiter is rude." 

The Weird Sisters, sadly, irritated me enough from the beginning that I found myself just looking for things to be bothered by (and, as is almost always the case when you're looking for flaws, they are to be found). I didn't like the first person group point of view ("We were too easy on her, yes. . . "), I have deep distaste for books where affairs are a large part of the storyline, and I found all three sisters unlikeable. I found all the Shakespeare references to be a little pretentious. Sometimes, I'm just a big grumpus (as we call them in our house).

The story is about three sisters (all named for Shakespeare women by their Shakespeare-obsessed professor father), all grown and now drawn back to their childhood home, ostensibly because of their mother's recent cancer diagnosis, but really because they're all freaking messes.

Rose is engaged but can't stand the thought of leaving her hometown, even though the opportunities for work for both her and the fiance are small, Bianca has fled the tiny college town for NYC which was all well and good until she started embezzling money from the small law office she works at and now has no references, no money, and also an enormous debt to settle (why they didn't have her arrested is beyond me). And Cordelia has spent her life flitting from place to place, living on the road, and now is pregnant (and she's not hundred percent sure, even, who the father is). Also, she has no money, no real skills, and no college degree.

In the book's defense, there was some clever writing, pages where I turned down the corners to mark a line that struck my fancy (like when Bianca is talking to the new pastor of the local church who assigns her ten Hail Marys as a joke and she reminds him that he isn't Catholic. "'Excellent point,' he said. 'I'll have to look it up in my Catholic to Episcopalian penance converter,'" or when Rose's fiance asks her what her life would have been like if she hadn't been the oldest sister and thus always the one in charge and she responds, "I'd probably have a less intense antacid habit.")

So, it's not the worst book I've ever read. In fact, by the end, I felt like it had redeemed itself a little. I mean, not enough to recommend, but enough to not make me wish to throw the book across the room in disgust.

Also, Merrick and Landen? I'm really glad we aren't these kind of insane sisters (at least I don't think we are).

I read this book for the BlogHer Book Club and you can read other reviews and discussions at BlogHer. I am paid for my participation in the BlogHer Book Club, but I choose which books to read and my reviews are strictly my own opinions. If I think a book is terrible, I'll say so. If I rave about a book, it's because it's one I'd give to Kayla or my mom.

6 comments:

  1. Hate every single thing about B. Hated the quotes, because sometimes they were just thrown in because one word in the quote referred to the situation, even if the whole quote didn't and then even the sisters were all, "Whaaa?" The thing with B and E was completely unnecessary. I kinda liked Cordy tho, I thought it was believeable that she was the baby and was just coming of age.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I jut read Lisa's review at Books Lists Life and now yours and I feel sort of guilty for liking this one. Not my favorite, and I agree about the annoying POV, but I think it would be a title that would lend itself to plenty of discussion in a book club. Reading your review makes me want to rethink my position. Now that these flaws have been pointed out, would I pick it apart, too?

    ReplyDelete
  3. HAHAHA - I just finished this book and liked it. Didn't love it, not my favorite book ever, but good. I kind of liked the sisters, though they did each have flaws. But I felt like they were trying to work on their flaws, trying to improve. I always like to see that in a character.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have a friend at work who whined to me about this book. It isn't going on my list.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I tried to read this...and I couldn't get through. I kept getting confused on who was the narrator. Speaking of which, can someone please tell me who was narrating?? I seriously thought there were 4 main people. Not a fan...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just found your blog a couple of days ago...maybe through a recipe on foodgawker? I'm an avid reader and have been trying to find age and ability appropriate books for my 7 year old daughter. (She's advanced in ability--but I don't want her reading books meant for more mature audiences yet. They grow up too fast without any encouragement!)

    Anyway...this book is on my list--based solely on the description. But, after reading your review, I'm going to remove it. It doesn't sound like one I want to spend my time on.

    ReplyDelete

I try to respond to most comments, so it will make my day if your email address is linked in your profile. If you're not sure if it's linked, you can add it by following these instructions.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...