July 22, 2009

Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins

TOTALLY SPOILER-FREE (unless you haven't read The Hunger Games, in which case, yeah, there are loads of spoilers here).

10 of 10: You couldn't ask for a better follow-up to The Hunger Games. There is no middle-of-the-trilogy slump here. I'd say Catching Fire was even better than the first book, incredible as that is.

For me, the sign of a really really good book is when I periodically have to leap off the couch, throw the book aside, and scream to the empty house, "OH MY WORD! This book is so so so good!" I must have done that twenty-five times yesterday, which I'm sure delighted Bart as he was trying to study.

I didn't mean to read this all in one day. I figured it'd take me at least two. And when noon rolled around and I'd only just cracked it and then I had to leave for a few hours, I thought there was no way I'd finish it. And yet, I did. The pages just flew by.

In The Hunger Games, I had a good feel for how the book would go, seeing as the back cover explained how the Hunger Games came about, how Katniss got picked to go, and then how she is in the Games to play to the death. Sure, you don't know all the details about Prim or Peeta and those are certainly surprises, but I think I can safely say that most people have a good feel for the general story arc going in. Right?

This book, I had absolutely no idea what was going to happen. Basically all that the various blurbs I've read say is that the Capitol is pretty angry at Katniss (and, by extension, Peeta) for getting the upper hand at the end of the Games and now they want revenge. And that unrest in the districts is building. But I had no clue what the main arc was going to be - would there be a war, some massive showdown with the Capitol, swift deaths, a run into the unknown (a la The Giver), or something else entirely? I just didn't know. And that's a pretty fun way to read a book.

A lot of the hype about book 2 has been the love triangle. I remember people saying a lot about the crazy love triangle in book 1, but, c'mon people. Peeta got 99% of the screen-time and Katniss didn't say all that much about Gale. I demand more from my love triangles.

This one gave me the love triangle I hoped for. It really annoys me when a series presents a main love interest, makes him/her seem amazing and perfect and then, in the next book suddenly makes them in to a world class jerk so that of course they aren't the one the person picks. I wondered if that would be the case in this book, if Peeta or Gale would suddenly and inexplicably turn in to a complete scumbag, and I'd have to be really annoyed.

But no, that's not what happens. Gale is as solid and great and understanding as Book 1 would lead you to believe, and Peeta is just a sweet and perfect as he was in The Hunger Games (Haymitch tells Katniss at one point, "You could live a hundred lifetimes and not deserve him"). Every time Katniss is around Gale, I would think "Oh, pick HIM!" but then she'd be with with Peeta and I'd think, "Wait, no, HIM." The bad thing about a good love triangle is that she can't pick BOTH. Ack. And unlike Twilight, where I basically never thought Bella would pick Jacob for one second, both of these guys were totally possible choices.

Catching Fire gave me that same horrifying feeling towards the end that Hunger Games did, as I suddenly realized I was only twenty pages from the end and there was no chance that there was going to be a big resolution to all the questions the book had laid out. I'd heard from basically every review I read that it was a giant cliffhanger, and I kept hoping that the cliffhanger would be a legitimate one (like at the end of Harry Potter 6 when you just have no idea if Snape is a good guy or a bad guy), rather than a "Harry Potter stood at the edge of a cliff, with Voldemort's wand pointed at him. He knew he was going to die. TO BE CONTINUED IN BOOK 2."

Because, really? That is not a real cliffhanger, since would you have really believed Harry Potter was going to get murdered straight off in the second book? No. Fortunately, Suzanne Collins makes it a real cliffhanger, like the end of The Hunger Games, where there are dozens of questions to be answered and a lot of things still to be resolved and a lot hanging in the balance.

I also heard that if you hadn't read The Hunger Games yet, you should wait until all three books were out to read it, but I totally disagree with that. I didn't close the book thinking, "AHHHHHH, I have to wait at least a year for the next one." Instead I was so thrilled that there is more to this story, that these characters aren't done yet, that this series is not over and closed. If you somehow have missed The Hunger Games thus far, don't wait to get a copy. There is no reason to wait until the last book comes out. Jump on this bandwagon NOW, people.

Overall, I have to say this book was better. Everything about it was just a little stronger, I thought - the characters were richer, the plot twists are more surprising, and it's more funny than The Hunger Games. I laughed a lot, when I wasn't freaking out over the latest plot development.

When I read The Hunger Games in San Francisco last summer, I spent a lot of time walking around the city telling Bart almost page by page what was going on in the book. This time, with the end of school in sight and free-reading time available in just few weeks for him, he won't let me tell him anything about this book because he's planning to read it himself. And it is killing me.

(Also, go check out this super funny comic about Catching Fire).

22 comments:

  1. I'm living through you right now...as i want to read this book so much. I love that you read it in one day and I do the same, screaming and exclaiming-"talking out loud to my books" is what my husband says!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. OK, this is awesome and I am DYING to read the book. Pay it forward! Pass it on! Maybe everyone in the blogosphere can have read it before it even comes out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. AAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!

    You are KILLING me here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. INSANELY jealous! #21 on the request list at the library!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Have you loaned it out yet??? I live close and i am a FAST reader. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE????

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who knew that librarians had their own comics?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Seriously, I need to read this one. It's sitting on my stack. I don't know what's wrong with me.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hate that is get these books early...boo to you.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I love this review, there is so much enthusiasm in it! I can barely wait to get my hands on a copy now!! It's not very often one of your books gets such a strong 10/10! When does it come out to the general public?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Really. You can mail it to me. I'll be so fast you won't even miss it. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Love triangle sans forgone (and wrong, might I add) conclusion a la Twilight??? Now I'm REALLY excited to read this!

    ReplyDelete
  12. YAY! I'M EVEN MORE EXCITED NOW!

    WE JUST REVIEWED THE HUNGER GAMES IN MY BOOK CLUB. AND EVERYONE LOVED IT! CATCHING FIRE WILL BE OUR OCTOBER BOOK. I EMAILED EVERYONE YOUR REVIEW! :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oooh I can't wait to read it! Thanks for the heads up that it's coming!

    ReplyDelete
  14. /hanging head in shame
    I haven't read The Hunger Games. I take it I must? Here comes another 50c holding fee!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm laughing at you because as I read Fire....David sat on his computer and shook his head every time I said out loud...."This book is so good" (usually during a bathroom break)....I can totally relate. I wonder what people are going to think of me tomorrow on the airplane when I continue to talk out load...tee hee!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I've seen this one around the blogs lately and have had no real draw to it - until now. Your enthusiasm has intrigued me and now I'm thinking of picking up Hunger Games and see what all the buzz is about. Thanks for the review!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hooray!!!! I knew you would love it!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ohhh - goodie! Hate it when the next book is a dud!! Glad we have you to weed through these for us!

    ReplyDelete
  19. How can I be you so that I get advanced copies? You are living my dream, girl!

    And, this review has me so excited for this book. I'm over 500 back in my library's cue, so here is for hoping that they get more copies!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I just finished this one. It is just as good as you describe, and multiple times I said out loud, "this is a GOOD book!" There were also many times when I said, "I can NOT believe they just did that!" (for example, the whistler, Cinna, Gale, etc.) Loved it. Can't wait for the third book.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Okay, I realize I'm months late here...but I just re-found this post on your book list.

    I really liked Catching Fire, although I had some issues with some of Suzanne Collins' run-on sentences and wording choices. I wanted to bust out a red pen and fix a sentence or two on every single page. So that was annoying.

    Overall, I wasn't as consumed with this as I was with Hunger Games, Kat kind of drove me crazy, actually. And I hated that she was the last person to ever understand what was going on. Plot twists don't count if the reader figures them out 45 pages before the character does, in my opinion.

    xox

    ReplyDelete

I try to respond to most comments, so it will make my day if your email address is linked in your profile. If you're not sure if it's linked, you can add it by following these instructions.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...